Is MAKO or NAMM more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Mako Mining Corp (MAKO) and Namib Minerals (NAMM) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. MAKO has a Quality of Company score of 2.0/10 while NAMM scores 6.1/10.

Which is a better buy — MAKO or NAMM?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do MAKO and NAMM valuations compare?

MAKO at $8.58 and NAMM at $1.45 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

MAKO vs NAMM Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

MAKO

Gold

Mako Mining Corp

Quality

2.0

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$8.58

Last close

Models

10/13

Active

NAMM

Gold

Namib Minerals

Quality

6.1

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$1.45

Last close

Models

8/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	MAKO Fair Value	MAKO Upside	NAMM Fair Value	NAMM Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$2.27	-73.5%	$0.22	-85.0%
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$7.32	-12.3%	—	—
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	—	—	$1.45	-0.2%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MAKO vs NAMM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MAKO vs NAMM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NAMM scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs MAKO's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mako Mining Corp (MAKO) and Namib Minerals (NAMM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MAKO currently trades at $8.58 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while NAMM trades at $1.45 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).