LYG vs PGC

Lloyds Banking Group Plc vs Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor — Valuation Comparison 2026

LYG

Commercial Banks, NEC
Lloyds Banking Group Plc
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.47
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

PGC

Commercial Banks, NEC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$43.25
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LYG Fair ValueLYG Upside PGC Fair ValuePGC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.79 -67.2% $22.65 -47.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.42 -54.7% $25.23 -41.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LYG vs PGC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LYG vs PGC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PGC scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs LYG's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lloyds Banking Group Plc (LYG) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor (PGC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LYG currently trades at $5.47 with a QOC of 1.9/10, while PGC trades at $43.25 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).