LYG vs MUFG

Lloyds Banking Group Plc vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, — Valuation Comparison 2026

LYG

Commercial Banks, NEC
Lloyds Banking Group Plc
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.47
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

MUFG

Commercial Banks, NEC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group,
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$18.71
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LYG Fair ValueLYG Upside MUFG Fair ValueMUFG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.79 -67.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.42 -54.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $6.36 +18.2% $2.24 -88.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $6.25 +14.3% $43.85 +134.4%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LYG vs MUFG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LYG vs MUFG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MUFG scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs LYG's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lloyds Banking Group Plc (LYG) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, (MUFG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LYG currently trades at $5.47 with a QOC of 1.9/10, while MUFG trades at $18.71 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).