LW vs PLAG

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. vs Planet Green Holdings Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LW

Canned, Frozen & Preservd Fruit, Veg & Food Specialties
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$43.18
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PLAG

Canned, Frozen & Preservd Fruit, Veg & Food Specialties
Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Quality
3.9
out of 10
Value Trap
47
WARN
Price
$1.55
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LW Fair ValueLW Upside PLAG Fair ValuePLAG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.81 -73.0% $0.65 -58.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.19 -88.0% $3.60 +97.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LW vs PLAG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LW vs PLAG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LW scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs PLAG's 3.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LW currently trades at $43.18 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while PLAG trades at $1.55 with a QOC of 3.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).