LULU vs SGC

lululemon athletica inc. vs Superior Group of Companies, In — Valuation Comparison 2026

LULU

Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl
lululemon athletica inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$131.18
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SGC

Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl
Superior Group of Companies, In
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$12.79
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LULU Fair ValueLULU Upside SGC Fair ValueSGC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $133.54 +1.8% $21.88 +71.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $87.07 -33.6% $0.84 -92.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LULU vs SGC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LULU vs SGC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LULU scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs SGC's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) and Superior Group of Companies, In (SGC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LULU currently trades at $131.18 with a QOC of 9.1/10, while SGC trades at $12.79 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).

LULU
View Full lululemon athletica inc. Analysis →
SGC
View Full Superior Group of Companies, In Analysis →