LPX vs NX

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation vs Quanex Building Products Corpor — Valuation Comparison 2026

LPX

Building Products & Equipment
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$76.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NX

Building Products & Equipment
Quanex Building Products Corpor
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$18.83
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LPX Fair ValueLPX Upside NX Fair ValueNX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.97 -71.1% $16.27 -13.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.24 -80.0% $2.34 -86.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LPX vs NX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LPX vs NX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NX scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs LPX's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) and Quanex Building Products Corpor (NX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LPX currently trades at $76.09 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while NX trades at $18.83 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).