LOPE vs MYND

Grand Canyon Education, Inc. vs Mynd.ai, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LOPE

Education & Training Services
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$150.56
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MYND

Education & Training Services
Mynd.ai, Inc.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
49
WARN
Price
$0.29
Last close
Models
5/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LOPE Fair ValueLOPE Upside MYND Fair ValueMYND Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $89.63 -40.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $50.52 -66.4% $0.38 +11.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.07 -77.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LOPE vs MYND — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LOPE vs MYND — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LOPE scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs MYND's 4.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and Mynd.ai, Inc. (MYND) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LOPE currently trades at $150.56 with a QOC of 9.1/10, while MYND trades at $0.29 with a QOC of 4.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).