LMND vs OXBR

Lemonade, Inc. vs Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

LMND

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Lemonade, Inc.
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$58.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OXBR

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$1.03
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LMND Fair ValueLMND Upside OXBR Fair ValueOXBR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.80 -65.9% $0.25 -75.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.37 -65.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.26 -74.9%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LMND vs OXBR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LMND vs OXBR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LMND scores higher with a 7.0/10 quality rating vs OXBR's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) and Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (OXBR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LMND currently trades at $58.00 with a QOC of 7.0/10, while OXBR trades at $1.03 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).