LIN vs MTX

Linde plc vs Minerals Technologies Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LIN

Industrial Inorganic Chemicals
Linde plc
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$497.69
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MTX

Industrial Inorganic Chemicals
Minerals Technologies Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$77.02
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LIN Fair ValueLIN Upside MTX Fair ValueMTX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $230.39 -53.7% $5.97 -92.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $101.89 -79.5% $49.33 -35.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LIN vs MTX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LIN vs MTX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MTX scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs LIN's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Linde plc (LIN) and Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LIN currently trades at $497.69 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while MTX trades at $77.02 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).