LIFE vs NP

Ethos Technologies Inc. vs Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LIFE

Insurance Brokers
Ethos Technologies Inc.
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$19.58
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NP

Insurance Brokers
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$27.91
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LIFE Fair ValueLIFE Upside NP Fair ValueNP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.52 -71.8% $1.82 -93.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.33 -57.5% $0.43 -98.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LIFE vs NP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LIFE vs NP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LIFE scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs NP's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ethos Technologies Inc. (LIFE) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LIFE currently trades at $19.58 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while NP trades at $27.91 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).