LGPS vs MHO

LogProstyle Inc. vs M/I Homes, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LGPS

Operative Builders
LogProstyle Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.65
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

MHO

Operative Builders
M/I Homes, Inc.
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$131.62
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LGPS Fair ValueLGPS Upside MHO Fair ValueMHO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.65 +155.6% $73.89 -43.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $165.60 +25.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $1.13 +75.3% $263.67 +100.3%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LGPS vs MHO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LGPS vs MHO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MHO scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs LGPS's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing LogProstyle Inc. (LGPS) and M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LGPS currently trades at $0.65 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while MHO trades at $131.62 with a QOC of 9.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).