LCUT vs SWK

Lifetime Brands, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LCUT

Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$8.55
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SWK

Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$79.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LCUT Fair ValueLCUT Upside SWK Fair ValueSWK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.28 -61.7% $4.83 -93.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.78 +14.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $2.14 -74.9% $78.15 +2.0%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LCUT vs SWK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LCUT vs SWK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LCUT scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs SWK's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LCUT currently trades at $8.55 with a QOC of 6.6/10, while SWK trades at $79.42 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).