LARK vs MFG

Landmark Bancorp Inc. vs Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. Sp — Valuation Comparison 2026

LARK

National Commercial Banks
Landmark Bancorp Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$28.42
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

MFG

National Commercial Banks
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. Sp
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$8.97
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LARK Fair ValueLARK Upside MFG Fair ValueMFG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.70 -34.2% $46.49 +418.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.52 -13.7% $41.77 +365.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LARK vs MFG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LARK vs MFG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LARK scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs MFG's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Landmark Bancorp Inc. (LARK) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. Sp (MFG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LARK currently trades at $28.42 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while MFG trades at $8.97 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).