LANV vs NCI

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited vs Neo-Concept International Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

LANV

Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.50
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

NCI

Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl
Neo-Concept International Group
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$10.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LANV Fair ValueLANV Upside NCI Fair ValueNCI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.60 -61.7% $0.59 -94.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.63 +254.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.09 -91.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LANV vs NCI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LANV vs NCI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NCI scores higher with a 7.4/10 quality rating vs LANV's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Neo-Concept International Group (NCI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LANV currently trades at $1.50 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while NCI trades at $10.10 with a QOC of 7.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).