LADR vs LANDP

Ladder Capital Corp vs Gladstone Land Corporation - 6. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LADR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Ladder Capital Corp
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.22
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

LANDP

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Gladstone Land Corporation - 6.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$20.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LADR Fair ValueLADR Upside LANDP Fair ValueLANDP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.75 -91.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $0.56 -94.5% $9.75 -52.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $37.75 +269.3% $4.92 -75.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LADR vs LANDP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LADR vs LANDP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LADR scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs LANDP's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Gladstone Land Corporation - 6. (LANDP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LADR currently trades at $10.22 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while LANDP trades at $20.41 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).