LAD vs OPLN

Lithia Motors, Inc. vs OPENLANE, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LAD

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Lithia Motors, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$295.62
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

OPLN

Auto & Truck Dealerships
OPENLANE, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$37.66
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LAD Fair ValueLAD Upside OPLN Fair ValueOPLN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $50.64 -81.7% $20.65 -45.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $100.71 -65.4% $9.60 -74.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LAD vs OPLN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LAD vs OPLN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LAD scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs OPLN's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and OPENLANE, Inc. (OPLN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LAD currently trades at $295.62 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while OPLN trades at $37.66 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).