LAC vs MP

Lithium Americas Corp. vs MP Materials Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LAC

Metal Mining
Lithium Americas Corp.
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$5.21
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

MP

Metal Mining
MP Materials Corp.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$64.70
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LAC Fair ValueLAC Upside MP Fair ValueMP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.52 -70.8% $13.81 -78.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.58 -94.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.14 -78.2% $4.95 -92.3%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LAC vs MP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LAC vs MP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MP scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs LAC's 5.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and MP Materials Corp. (MP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LAC currently trades at $5.21 with a QOC of 5.0/10, while MP trades at $64.70 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).