L vs LMND

Loews Corporation vs Lemonade, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

L

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Loews Corporation
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
3
SAFE
Price
$104.82
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LMND

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Lemonade, Inc.
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$58.04
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType L Fair ValueL Upside LMND Fair ValueLMND Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $311.23 +196.9% $20.03 -65.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $30.21 -71.2% $19.37 -65.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for L vs LMND — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

L vs LMND — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

L scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs LMND's 7.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Loews Corporation (L) and Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

L currently trades at $104.82 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while LMND trades at $58.04 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).