KYIV vs TIGO

Kyivstar Group Ltd. vs Millicom International Cellular — Valuation Comparison 2026

KYIV

Radiotelephone Communications
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TIGO

Radiotelephone Communications
Millicom International Cellular
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$85.36
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KYIV Fair ValueKYIV Upside TIGO Fair ValueTIGO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.48 +22.4% $66.14 -22.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.27 -49.1% $76.89 -9.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KYIV vs TIGO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KYIV vs TIGO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TIGO scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs KYIV's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kyivstar Group Ltd. (KYIV) and Millicom International Cellular (TIGO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KYIV currently trades at $14.28 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while TIGO trades at $85.36 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).