KYIV vs SIDU

Kyivstar Group Ltd. vs Sidus Space, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KYIV

Radiotelephone Communications
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SIDU

Radiotelephone Communications
Sidus Space, Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$4.91
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KYIV Fair ValueKYIV Upside SIDU Fair ValueSIDU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.48 +22.4% $1.25 -74.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.27 -49.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $2.51 -82.4% $0.47 -90.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KYIV vs SIDU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KYIV vs SIDU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KYIV scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs SIDU's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kyivstar Group Ltd. (KYIV) and Sidus Space, Inc. (SIDU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KYIV currently trades at $14.28 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while SIDU trades at $4.91 with a QOC of 4.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).