KTB vs RL

Kontoor Brands, Inc. vs Ralph Lauren Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

KTB

Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$71.77
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RL

Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$363.90
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KTB Fair ValueKTB Upside RL Fair ValueRL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.35 -45.2% $293.71 -19.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.02 -52.6% $114.28 -68.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KTB vs RL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KTB vs RL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KTB scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs RL's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KTB currently trades at $71.77 with a QOC of 9.9/10, while RL trades at $363.90 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).