KTB vs PVH

Kontoor Brands, Inc. vs PVH Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KTB

Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$71.77
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PVH

Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments
PVH Corp.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$93.28
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KTB Fair ValueKTB Upside PVH Fair ValuePVH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.35 -45.2% $89.87 -3.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.02 -52.6% $2.06 -97.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KTB vs PVH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KTB vs PVH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KTB scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs PVH's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and PVH Corp. (PVH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KTB currently trades at $71.77 with a QOC of 9.9/10, while PVH trades at $93.28 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).