KRT vs NWL

Karat Packaging Inc. vs Newell Brands Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KRT

Plastics Products, NEC
Karat Packaging Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$27.12
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NWL

Plastics Products, NEC
Newell Brands Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$3.40
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KRT Fair ValueKRT Upside NWL Fair ValueNWL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $31.86 +17.5% $3.92 -1.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $16.21 -40.2% $5.83 +71.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KRT vs NWL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KRT vs NWL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KRT scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs NWL's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KRT currently trades at $27.12 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while NWL trades at $3.40 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).