KRP vs MNR

Kimbell Royalty Partners vs Mach Natural Resources LP — Valuation Comparison 2026

KRP

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Kimbell Royalty Partners
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$15.01
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MNR

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Mach Natural Resources LP
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$13.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KRP Fair ValueKRP Upside MNR Fair ValueMNR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $27.34 +82.1% $53.27 +301.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.25 -71.7% $14.71 +10.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KRP vs MNR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KRP vs MNR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MNR scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs KRP's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) and Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KRP currently trades at $15.01 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while MNR trades at $13.28 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).