KLXE vs NINE

KLX Energy Services Holdings, I vs Nine Energy Service, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KLXE

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
KLX Energy Services Holdings, I
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.74
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

NINE

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$10.24
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KLXE Fair ValueKLXE Upside NINE Fair ValueNINE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.99 -31.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.61 +400.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $44.45 +334.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $2.25 -17.7% $2.36 -77.0%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KLXE vs NINE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KLXE vs NINE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NINE scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs KLXE's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing KLX Energy Services Holdings, I (KLXE) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KLXE currently trades at $2.74 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while NINE trades at $10.24 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).