KIM vs KRG

Kimco Realty Corporation (HC) vs Kite Realty Group Trust — Valuation Comparison 2026

KIM

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Kimco Realty Corporation (HC)
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$24.08
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KRG

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Kite Realty Group Trust
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$27.42
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KIM Fair ValueKIM Upside KRG Fair ValueKRG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.21 -11.9% $0.73 -97.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.98 -62.7% $11.61 -57.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KIM vs KRG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KIM vs KRG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KRG scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs KIM's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kimco Realty Corporation (HC) (KIM) and Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KIM currently trades at $24.08 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while KRG trades at $27.42 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).