KGS vs NGG

Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. vs National Grid Transco, PLC Nati — Valuation Comparison 2026

KGS

Natural Gas Transmission
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$66.85
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NGG

Natural Gas Transmission
National Grid Transco, PLC Nati
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$81.53
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KGS Fair ValueKGS Upside NGG Fair ValueNGG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.58 -85.7% $8.51 -89.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.78 -96.2% $55.50 -31.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KGS vs NGG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KGS vs NGG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KGS scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs NGG's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) and National Grid Transco, PLC Nati (NGG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KGS currently trades at $66.85 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while NGG trades at $81.53 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).