JOE vs STRS

St. Joe Company (The) vs Stratus Properties Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JOE

Land Subdividers & Developers (No Cemeteries)
St. Joe Company (The)
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$63.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

STRS

Land Subdividers & Developers (No Cemeteries)
Stratus Properties Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
33
LOW
Price
$28.59
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JOE Fair ValueJOE Upside STRS Fair ValueSTRS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $37.22 -41.5% $8.17 -71.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.41 -77.4% $19.49 -35.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JOE vs STRS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JOE vs STRS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JOE scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs STRS's 5.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing St. Joe Company (The) (JOE) and Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JOE currently trades at $63.63 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while STRS trades at $28.59 with a QOC of 5.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).