JOBY vs OMAB

Joby Aviation, Inc. vs Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro — Valuation Comparison 2026

JOBY

Airports & Air Services
Joby Aviation, Inc.
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$12.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OMAB

Airports & Air Services
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$100.72
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JOBY Fair ValueJOBY Upside OMAB Fair ValueOMAB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.36 -64.5% $87.72 -12.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.91 -54.0% $76.79 -23.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JOBY vs OMAB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JOBY vs OMAB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OMAB scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs JOBY's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro (OMAB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JOBY currently trades at $12.30 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while OMAB trades at $100.72 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).