JLL vs OMH

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated vs Ohmyhome Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

JLL

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$282.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OMH

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Ohmyhome Limited
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$0.82
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JLL Fair ValueJLL Upside OMH Fair ValueOMH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $208.42 -26.2% $0.22 -72.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $116.06 -58.9% $5.42 +423.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JLL vs OMH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JLL vs OMH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JLL scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs OMH's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JLL currently trades at $282.31 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while OMH trades at $0.82 with a QOC of 6.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).