JLL vs LRHC

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated vs La Rosa Holdings Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JLL

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$282.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LRHC

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
La Rosa Holdings Corp.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$1.31
Last close
Models
3/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JLL Fair ValueJLL Upside LRHC Fair ValueLRHC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $208.42 -26.2% $1.99 -8.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $116.06 -58.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $345.28 +22.3% $0.09 -95.0%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JLL vs LRHC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JLL vs LRHC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JLL scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs LRHC's 5.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JLL currently trades at $282.31 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while LRHC trades at $1.31 with a QOC of 5.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).