JHS vs KBDC

John Hancock Income Securities vs Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JHS

Asset Management
John Hancock Income Securities
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.14
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

KBDC

Asset Management
Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc.
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$14.77
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JHS Fair ValueJHS Upside KBDC Fair ValueKBDC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.95 -73.5% $2.04 -86.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $7.17 -35.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $10.13 -8.0% $14.04 -4.9%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JHS vs KBDC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JHS vs KBDC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KBDC scores higher with a 4.1/10 quality rating vs JHS's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing John Hancock Income Securities (JHS) and Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JHS currently trades at $11.14 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while KBDC trades at $14.77 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).