JEM vs ROST

707 Cayman Holdings Limited vs Ross Stores, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JEM

Apparel Retail
707 Cayman Holdings Limited
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.51
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

ROST

Apparel Retail
Ross Stores, Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$227.20
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JEM Fair ValueJEM Upside ROST Fair ValueROST Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.84 +22.1% $64.49 -71.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.78 -37.9% $42.67 -81.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JEM vs ROST — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JEM vs ROST — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ROST scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs JEM's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing 707 Cayman Holdings Limited (JEM) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JEM currently trades at $1.51 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while ROST trades at $227.20 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).