JEM vs JILL

707 Cayman Holdings Limited vs J. Jill, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JEM

Apparel Retail
707 Cayman Holdings Limited
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.51
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

JILL

Apparel Retail
J. Jill, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$13.26
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JEM Fair ValueJEM Upside JILL Fair ValueJILL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.84 +22.1% $24.98 +88.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.78 -37.9% $21.19 +59.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JEM vs JILL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JEM vs JILL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JILL scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs JEM's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing 707 Cayman Holdings Limited (JEM) and J. Jill, Inc. (JILL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JEM currently trades at $1.51 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while JILL trades at $13.26 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).