JCI vs LMB

Johnson Controls International vs Limbach Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JCI

Building Products & Equipment
Johnson Controls International
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$136.15
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

LMB

Building Products & Equipment
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$79.61
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JCI Fair ValueJCI Upside LMB Fair ValueLMB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $35.09 -74.2% $24.67 -69.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.34 -88.7% $21.79 -72.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JCI vs LMB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JCI vs LMB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JCI scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs LMB's 8.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Johnson Controls International (JCI) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JCI currently trades at $136.15 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while LMB trades at $79.61 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).