JBGS vs LADR

JBG SMITH Properties vs Ladder Capital Corp — Valuation Comparison 2026

JBGS

Real Estate Investment Trusts
JBG SMITH Properties
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$14.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LADR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Ladder Capital Corp
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.22
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JBGS Fair ValueJBGS Upside LADR Fair ValueLADR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $14.36 -2.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $0.56 -94.5%
First Chicago Scenario $55.19 +276.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $72.60 +394.9% $37.75 +269.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JBGS vs LADR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JBGS vs LADR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LADR scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs JBGS's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JBGS currently trades at $14.67 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while LADR trades at $10.22 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).