JAN vs KIM

Janus Living, Inc. vs Kimco Realty Corporation (HC) — Valuation Comparison 2026

JAN

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Janus Living, Inc.
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$26.77
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KIM

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Kimco Realty Corporation (HC)
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$24.08
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JAN Fair ValueJAN Upside KIM Fair ValueKIM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.88 -70.6% $21.21 -11.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.39 -58.6% $8.98 -62.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JAN vs KIM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JAN vs KIM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KIM scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs JAN's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Janus Living, Inc. (JAN) and Kimco Realty Corporation (HC) (KIM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JAN currently trades at $26.77 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while KIM trades at $24.08 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).