JAKK vs KMRK

JAKKS Pacific, Inc. vs K-Tech Solutions Company Limite — Valuation Comparison 2026

JAKK

Games, Toys & Children's Vehicles (No Dolls & Bicycles)
JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$22.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KMRK

Games, Toys & Children's Vehicles (No Dolls & Bicycles)
K-Tech Solutions Company Limite
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$2.20
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JAKK Fair ValueJAKK Upside KMRK Fair ValueKMRK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.07 -68.0% $0.54 -75.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.97 -68.4% $0.06 -97.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JAKK vs KMRK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JAKK vs KMRK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JAKK scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs KMRK's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) and K-Tech Solutions Company Limite (KMRK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JAKK currently trades at $22.09 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while KMRK trades at $2.20 with a QOC of 2.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).