IVR vs JBGS

INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC vs JBG SMITH Properties — Valuation Comparison 2026

IVR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$7.87
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

JBGS

Real Estate Investment Trusts
JBG SMITH Properties
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$14.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IVR Fair ValueIVR Upside JBGS Fair ValueJBGS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.37 +95.3% $14.36 -2.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.40 -47.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $1.51 -80.8% $55.19 +276.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IVR vs JBGS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IVR vs JBGS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IVR scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs JBGS's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing INVESCO MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC (IVR) and JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IVR currently trades at $7.87 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while JBGS trades at $14.67 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).