IT vs JKHY

Gartner, Inc. vs Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IT

Information Technology Services
Gartner, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$161.18
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

JKHY

Information Technology Services
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$136.22
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IT Fair ValueIT Upside JKHY Fair ValueJKHY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $422.24 +162.0% $111.76 -18.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $67.30 -58.2% $54.96 -59.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IT vs JKHY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IT vs JKHY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IT scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs JKHY's 9.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Gartner, Inc. (IT) and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IT currently trades at $161.18 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while JKHY trades at $136.22 with a QOC of 9.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).