IRWD vs IXHL

Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Incannex Healthcare Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IRWD

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$3.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IXHL

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Incannex Healthcare Inc.
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$3.35
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IRWD Fair ValueIRWD Upside IXHL Fair ValueIXHL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.29 +328.3% $4.37 +30.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.71 +59.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.08 -97.8% $6.70 +100.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IRWD vs IXHL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IRWD vs IXHL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IRWD scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs IXHL's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IRWD) and Incannex Healthcare Inc. (IXHL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IRWD currently trades at $3.57 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while IXHL trades at $3.35 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).