IR vs ITW

Ingersoll Rand Inc. vs Illinois Tool Works Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IR

General Industrial Machinery & Equipment
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$71.64
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ITW

General Industrial Machinery & Equipment
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$247.28
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IR Fair ValueIR Upside ITW Fair ValueITW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $60.09 -16.1% $89.32 -63.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.72 -68.3% $97.10 -60.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IR vs ITW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IR vs ITW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IR scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs ITW's 9.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) and Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IR currently trades at $71.64 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while ITW trades at $247.28 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).