IPAR vs OLPX

Interparfums, Inc. vs Olaplex Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IPAR

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
Interparfums, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$94.37
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

OLPX

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
Olaplex Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$2.04
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IPAR Fair ValueIPAR Upside OLPX Fair ValueOLPX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $30.91 -67.2% $3.61 +77.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.26 -57.3% $0.03 -98.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IPAR vs OLPX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IPAR vs OLPX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IPAR scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs OLPX's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Interparfums, Inc. (IPAR) and Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IPAR currently trades at $94.37 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while OLPX trades at $2.04 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).