INVE vs MITK

Identiv, Inc. vs Mitek Systems, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

INVE

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Identiv, Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$4.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

MITK

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Mitek Systems, Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$17.18
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType INVE Fair ValueINVE Upside MITK Fair ValueMITK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.61 -11.8% $14.59 -15.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.20 +45.2% $3.73 -78.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for INVE vs MITK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

INVE vs MITK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MITK scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs INVE's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Identiv, Inc. (INVE) and Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

INVE currently trades at $4.10 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while MITK trades at $17.18 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).