INEO vs MBLY

INNEOVA Holdings Limited vs Mobileye Global Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

INEO

Auto Parts
INNEOVA Holdings Limited
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.61
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

MBLY

Auto Parts
Mobileye Global Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.41
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType INEO Fair ValueINEO Upside MBLY Fair ValueMBLY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.16 -73.6% $12.41 +19.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.98 +140.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $0.15 -74.9% $16.70 +60.4%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for INEO vs MBLY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

INEO vs MBLY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MBLY scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs INEO's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing INNEOVA Holdings Limited (INEO) and Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

INEO currently trades at $0.61 with a QOC of 2.3/10, while MBLY trades at $10.41 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).