ILAG vs JELD

Intelligent Living Application vs JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ILAG

Building Products & Equipment
Intelligent Living Application
Quality
1.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$3.76
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

JELD

Building Products & Equipment
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$2.11
Last close
Models
5/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ILAG Fair ValueILAG Upside JELD Fair ValueJELD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.00 -73.5% $3.25 +122.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.37 -90.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $2.81 -25.3% $9.16 +334.0%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ILAG vs JELD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ILAG vs JELD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JELD scores higher with a 5.0/10 quality rating vs ILAG's 1.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Intelligent Living Application (ILAG) and JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ILAG currently trades at $3.76 with a QOC of 1.5/10, while JELD trades at $2.11 with a QOC of 5.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).