IFS vs MUFG

Intercorp Financial Services In vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, — Valuation Comparison 2026

IFS

Commercial Banks, NEC
Intercorp Financial Services In
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$49.48
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MUFG

Commercial Banks, NEC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group,
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$18.71
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IFS Fair ValueIFS Upside MUFG Fair ValueMUFG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $77.73 +57.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $99.88 +101.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $91.22 +84.4% $2.24 -88.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $19.78 -60.0% $43.85 +134.4%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IFS vs MUFG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IFS vs MUFG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MUFG scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs IFS's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Intercorp Financial Services In (IFS) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, (MUFG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IFS currently trades at $49.48 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while MUFG trades at $18.71 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).