IBOC vs IFS

International Bancshares Corpor vs Intercorp Financial Services In — Valuation Comparison 2026

IBOC

Banks - Regional
International Bancshares Corpor
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$72.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IFS

Banks - Regional
Intercorp Financial Services In
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$48.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IBOC Fair ValueIBOC Upside IFS Fair ValueIFS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $119.60 +65.2% $77.77 +58.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $61.62 -14.9% $99.93 +104.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IBOC vs IFS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IBOC vs IFS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IBOC scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs IFS's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing International Bancshares Corpor (IBOC) and Intercorp Financial Services In (IFS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IBOC currently trades at $72.41 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while IFS trades at $48.93 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).