Is HYMC or MAKO more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Hycroft Mining Holding Corporat (HYMC) and Mako Mining Corp (MAKO) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. HYMC has a Quality of Company score of 4.8/10 while MAKO scores 2.0/10.

Which is a better buy — HYMC or MAKO?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do HYMC and MAKO valuations compare?

HYMC at $33.17 and MAKO at $8.58 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

HYMC vs MAKO Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

HYMC

Gold

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporat

Quality

4.8

out of 10

Value Trap

SAFE

Price

$33.17

Last close

Models

10/13

Active

MAKO

Gold

Mako Mining Corp

Quality

2.0

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$8.58

Last close

Models

10/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	HYMC Fair Value	HYMC Upside	MAKO Fair Value	MAKO Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$10.27	-69.0%	$2.27	-73.5%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$15.54	-59.2%	—	—
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$32.09	-2.8%	$7.32	-12.3%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HYMC vs MAKO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HYMC vs MAKO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HYMC scores higher with a 4.8/10 quality rating vs MAKO's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hycroft Mining Holding Corporat (HYMC) and Mako Mining Corp (MAKO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HYMC currently trades at $33.17 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while MAKO trades at $8.58 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).