HYMC vs IAG

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporat vs Iamgold Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

HYMC

Gold
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporat
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$33.17
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

IAG

Gold
Iamgold Corporation
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$17.36
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HYMC Fair ValueHYMC Upside IAG Fair ValueIAG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.27 -69.0% $5.79 -66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.54 -59.2% $7.60 -55.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HYMC vs IAG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HYMC vs IAG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HYMC scores higher with a 4.8/10 quality rating vs IAG's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hycroft Mining Holding Corporat (HYMC) and Iamgold Corporation (IAG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HYMC currently trades at $33.17 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while IAG trades at $17.36 with a QOC of 1.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).